starhobby.blogg.se

Ceridian your system currently lacks a supported version of the microsoft office web components
Ceridian your system currently lacks a supported version of the microsoft office web components




ceridian your system currently lacks a supported version of the microsoft office web components

  • Recommends to always use six decimal places (roughly one meter) rather than allowing for uncertainty values.
  • the Coordinate Reference System is not defined (see here why you should care).
  • That property has a range of shortcomings: The geographic location of a person’s office is of course one of those properties – even the original specification of vCard ( RFC 2426) contained an “GEO” property (defined in Section 3.4.2). vCards are “virtual business cards”, and contain a multitude of contact information about a person or an organization. The first specification that is using the “geo:” scheme seems to be the revision of the vCard format. There is currently a discussion going on the SIPCORE mailing list, and the proposal is that a “geo:” URI (when used in an “Geolocation” SIP header) would come with implicit default rules (currently under discussion whether those default rules would be GEOPRIV’s general default rules, or defaults specific to the use of “geo:” in the context of the “Geolocation:” header). In SIP Location Conveyance as a “GEOPRIV Using Protocol”, privacy is required. However, the “geo:” URI specifically lacks privacy rules, because an URI itself does not identify a Target, but rather reflects just a physical location in space. Which, obviously, would be much more compact, probably easier to parse, and not in the need of a seperate MIME body part. However, conveyance of a simple “point” type location could also be achieved by using the “geo:” URI in the Geolocation header directly as follows: Geolocation: PIDF-LO allows for great flexibility of location types, can contain civic addresses, and extensive privacy rules. Such a geolocation header (and respective body part) would look like this: Geolocation: -96.68142

    ceridian your system currently lacks a supported version of the microsoft office web components

    The current version of the SIP Location Conveyance Specification uses “Content ID” URIs (besides “sip”/”sips”/”pres”) to refer from the new “ Geolocation:” header to a MIME body part, which then contains the location embedded in a PIDF-LO Presence/Location document. An example of that could be location conveyance between contacts in a social network, or applications for “checking in”, such as Gowalla and Foursquare.

    ceridian your system currently lacks a supported version of the microsoft office web components

    This is important for services such as Emergency Services, but can of course be used for any other realtime application that needs to transmit location information in its session setup. A good percentage of phone calls being routed between carriers as of today already uses SIP.įor those reasons, the IETF is looking into ways to embed location information into SIP messages. SIP is the base for telephoney in the upcoming Next Generation networks such as LTE, and a major component of IMS systems. It has gained massive popularity in recent years, and is not just be used in VoIP-Software, but also in Public Branch Exchanges from various vendors, open source products such as Asterisk, Kamailio and a wide range of carrier products. SIP is the IETF’s protocol for establishing Realtime Application Sessions, and is very commonly used for Voice over IP. After the VCARDDAV working group has included “geo:” URIs in their revision of the vCard scheme, the SIPCORE working group is now discussing the use of “geo:” in their “Location Conveyance” draft. “geo:” is getting more attention in other areas of the Internet Engineering Task Force. More details and the actual specification are available here:

    #Ceridian your system currently lacks a supported version of the microsoft office web components android

    The GeoSMS developers themselves have already created an Android application called “I am Here”. Let’s hope that mobile phone developers implement GeoSMS (and, hence “geo:” URIs) in their future products. It’s nice to see how the design properties of the “geo:” URI (short, simple, human-readable) are the base for another simple and straightforward standard proposal. The proposal got an amazing amount of press coverage, including articles on New York Times, der Standard (german), Times of India, intomobile and various other news sites in the mobile and tech industry.

    ceridian your system currently lacks a supported version of the microsoft office web components

    This was actually a use case that i discussed with several IETF fellows during the development of the geo: URI specification – i’m happy that someone took the effort to write a formal specification. An initiative called “ GeoSMS” proposes the use of “geo:” URIs in text messages (mobile short messages – SMS).






    Ceridian your system currently lacks a supported version of the microsoft office web components